In message <0fee01cdcca7$f69c8530$e3d58f90$@acbcert.com>, dated Tue, 27
Nov 2012, Michael Derby <micha...@acbcert.com> writes:
As a final comment, yes, there are manufacturers involved in the ETSI
group
for EN 300 328. :-)
I asked when the thread context was that the new requirement (to apply a
provision of s not-yet-published edition) had been introduced without a
transition period of any sort. Manufacturers would normally object to
that very strongly. It now appears that there is a transition period.
But manufacturers' representatives on standards committees must
*disregard* the advance knowledge that they get from participation when
considering the impact of a change to a standard on the industry as a
whole, unless they have taken positive steps to inform their industry
associations of the new development.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
