What is the notation that indicates EN50564 has replaced EN62301? And how
should I interpret the "IEC 62301:2011 (Modified)" phrase per a standard
that could be used as presumption of conformity?

thanks much,
Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: EuP and 1275/2008 standards ?

The EN50564 replaces the EN 62301
See text on the site you refer:
 
EN 50564:2011
Electrical and electronic household and office equipment - Measurement of
low power consumption IEC 62301:2011 (Modified)
 
Gert Gremmen
Ce-test
 
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Brian Oconnell
Verzonden: donderdag 17 januari 2013 20:51
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: EuP and 1275/2008 standards ?
 
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/european-standards/harmonised-standa
rds/ecodesign/standbyandoffmode_en.htm 
 
Appears harmonized standards are now 'officially' EN50564 and IEC62301 for
presumption of conformity. So there will be no update to existing EN62301 ?
 
Brian

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to