I wrote an article on testing ESD simulators and mentioned the variability, 
especially for air discharge. There will also be variability between 
manufacturers and between test setups. I guess that's why contact discharge was 
developed. The article may be downloaded from here:

http://www.tmworld.com/design/design-and-prototyping/4380116/Check-ESD-simulators-first

The article refers to a presentation by Greg Senko and I with more detail on 
the variability (approach and angle of approach). The link in the article isn't 
correct, but a search should get you the presentation.

Ken

Kenneth Wyatt
Wyatt Technical Services LLC
Woodland Park, CO
[email protected]
www.emc-seminars.com
(Sent from my iPad)

On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:18 PM, Bill Owsley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just to toss in another variable...
> We have a couple of brands of ESD testers.
> One will cause failures when pulling the trigger for an air discharge, and 
> after the discharge, will cause another fail when releasing the trigger.  
> Monoitoring with an O'scope using a field probe of a home made design 
> demonstrates that the trigger pull and release cause a much larger ESD field 
> event than the actual designed event to the plane.  
> ESD is like target shooting with grenades, not exactly precise!
> We used to verify our ESD guns with a really well build by a craftsman 
> faraday cage to contain the o'scope and target.
> And found while do the usual discharges and the operator breathing in verses 
> breathing out effected the waveforms.
> We changed our procedure to setting the air discharge tip to a specific 
> distance, then pulling the trigger since the trigger spec. was much better 
> defined than a random gap with variable humidity.
> Our results always landed well within the requirements, as long as the 
> specified distance was controlled, and the trigger was pulled after setting 
> the distance.  Otherwise is was a crap shoot!
> Humidity and speed of approach are highly/wildly variable.
> Find a way to compensate and avoid those variables and the results and 
> waveforms settle down to very repeatable.
> The trigger mechanism is a well controlled device.
> The air discharge distance can be set by using a collet to set the spacing, 
> calculated as you please for the test voltage.
> And repeatable as you send around the collet or specifiy the distance.
> Humidity can be better controlled by a dehumidifier blowing across the test 
> area and humidity gauge monitoring the condition.
> Results tend to settle down to something you can believe... otherwise, they 
> are all over the place.
> I use ESD to the horizontal and vertical coupling planes without ground as a 
> lightning simulation.
> The previous EUTdemonstrates the same problem as found out in the wild, so we 
> deemed the made up test as valid for reproducing the field problem and good 
> for diagnosing the effects of design changes.
> The subsequent products designed to meet this artifical test have not had any 
> problems in the field.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> From: John Woodgate <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [PSES] test setup for table top ungrounded equipment 61000-4-2 
> IEC:2008 figure 6 page 20
> 
> In message 
> <d250d01e39356a4e9cc3b4b459d6655094db3...@ms-cda-01.advanced-input.com>, 
> dated Thu, 7 Mar 2013, "McInturff, Gary" <[email protected]> 
> writes:
> 
> > My humidity was a little on the low side, about 28% and theirs was closer 
> > to 38% or so.
> 
> I wasn't referring to test done at different locations; I meant that moving 
> the EUT from one place to another and then testing it might give results 
> affected by condensation, however slight. And condensation doesn't always 
> give better ESD test results; it alters discharge pathways and perhaps for 
> the worse.
> -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
> SHOCK HORROR! Dinosaur-like DNA found in chicken and turkey meals
> John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
> <[email protected]>
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
> 
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
> formats), large files, etc.
> 
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
> <[email protected]>
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
> 
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
> formats), large files, etc.
> 
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
> David Heald <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to