In message <[email protected]>, dated Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Ed Price <[email protected]> writes:


Indeed, that should be written on a wall in everbody's lab. Failures don't always go the way we expect; everything that the product does correctly has to be monitored for degradation, but beyond that, you have to be aware of the possibilities of the unexpected. How far you should continue down this dark tunnel of investigation depends on the cost and consequences of device failures, and the limit of your budget, paranoia and suspicion.

This is why 'risk assessment' was invented. But it is often impracticably complex, so a simplified approach is necessary, which might be 'overkill' but that is the penalty for simplification. If there is a high enough degree of immunity to ALL single disturbances that can occur in the product's environment with more than a minute probability, the probability that more than one simultaneous disturbance causes a malfunction is bound to be very small.

The key is to identify ALL single disturbances, and looking at the relevant EMC standard is NOT sufficient. For example, most don't consider the influence of magnetic fields.

A magnetic field is produced by EVERY current.

Transient currents, and therefore the magnetic fields they generate, can be at least an order of magnitude larger than the steady-state current in a circuit and its field strength.

A magnetic field induces a voltage into EVERY closed circuit, not just into transformers and inductors.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
SHOCK HORROR! Dinosaur-like DNA found in chicken and turkey meals
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to