In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed,
20 Mar 2013, Dward <[email protected]> writes:
So, while a test lab may not want to as it would most likely cause them
to lose a client, they could actually say something to the effect of
“While this device passed, in our opinion it is really a piece of
junk and should never be sold.” Or, if they really want the clients
business, they could say “This device is the best thing since sliced
bread.”
It must be a poor second best, because extensive tests have shown that
sliced bread produces no emissions and has very high immunity at all
frequencies. Indeed, exposure to high-intensity infra-red frequencies
improves it, according to some opinions, but others describe those
results as 'toast'.
Experienced test houses have carefully-shaped sentences to express their
views, such as 'This product will pass the relevant standard when the
following improvements in performance are made (see pages 2 to 5).'
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
SHOCK HORROR! Dinosaur-like DNA found in chicken and turkey meals
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
