In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue,
2 Apr 2013, Brian Oconnell <[email protected]> writes:
From this side of the pond and from my experience, components for use
by other mfrs in med and ITE have two principle requirements that would
be looked at by the governmental people - the CE mark on the component
and the declaration. If the governmental person goes further,
... you might be censured for putting the CE mark and producing a DoC
for a product that is exempt. Please look at the REGULATION (EC) No
765/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL:
2. The CE marking as presented in Annex II shall be affixed
only to products to which its affixing is provided for by specific
Community harmonisation legislation, and shall not be affixed
to any other product.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
They took me to a specialist burns unit - and made me learn 'To a haggis'.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
