Colleagues,

Maybe a slightly silly question, but I want to hear your opinions.

IEC 61000-4-4:2012 clause 7.3.1 says:

  Floor standing EUTs ... shall be placed on a ground reference
  plane and shall be insulated from it by an insulating support
  with a thickness of (0,1 +/- 0,05) m including non conductive
  roller/casters (see Figure 11).

When testing EUTs which have commonplace casters (caster which has
plastic wheel and metal hub and supporting structure) under it,
will you treat the casters as part of the required 0.1 m height
insulation support, or will you still put the casters on 0.1 m
insulating support?

In the former case, what if the casters were higher than 0.15 m?


In the case of IEC 61000-4-3:2006, it says that "Non-conductive
rollers may be used as the 0,05 m to 0,15 m support" but it
also says "... the support shall be bulk non-conducting, rather
than an insulating coating on a metallic structure.", so I think
we should put the casters, which have plastic wheel but metal hub
and metal supporting structure so probably not "bulk non-conducting",
on 0.1 m insulating support in this case.

Regards,
Tom

-- 
Tomonori Sato  <[email protected]>
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to