In message
<617eb8c8634c9149aa66c853d7b8ac5312e61...@by2prd0310mb389.namprd03.prod.o
utlook.com>, dated Thu, 13 Jun 2013, "Crane, Lauren"
<[email protected]> writes:
It's a real mixed bag. I've heard the old Blue Guide is under revision.
Maybe they will help clarify your question in it.
For me, the point is that if there were an incident, and the substitute
material were discovered, Gary's company would be held liable if they
had not disclosed the substitution. It is indeed of doubtful value to
read the small print of the standards and Directives in such a case.
In fact, a case of 'conspiracy [with the customer] to conceal' might
lie.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Why is the stapler always empty just when you want it?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
