In message <[email protected]>,
dated Wed, 10 Jul 2013, "Paasche, Dieter"
<[email protected]> writes:
At which point could you define a piece of machinery a fixed
Installation?
What are the differences in reference to EMC testing? It looks to me
that regardless of a piece of machinery being considered an apparatus
or a fixed installation, it still has to be tested to comply with EMC
requirements.
The Directive and the Guide make it quite reasonably clear about the
difference between a product (one of a kind) and a fixed installation
(something unique).
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Why is the stapler always empty just when you want it?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
