In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 17 Jul 2013,
Scott Douglas <[email protected]> writes:
Reading the sentence above the operative terms are generates AND uses.
And, because of the AND, since we do not generate then it makes no
difference if we use the signals. My translation is we do not generate
therefore Part 15 does not apply to this specific product.
I doubt you'd get away with that if the device actually caused
interference. The logic is that it and the output cable act as an
antenna. So, *exactly* what goes down the cable? First, is it balanced
or unbalanced? If balanced, emission would be minimal, but it probably
isn't balanced. So, are these 'pulses' bursts of sine waves, half-cycles
of sine waves or rectangular pulses with fast edges? If the latter, you
should do a pre-test to see if there are significant emissions in the
frequency range controlled by Part 15.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Why is the stapler always empty just when you want it?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
