One cannot use the transfer impedance of a current probe to convert a
current into a potential to be compared to a dBuV limit, because the
potential then depends on which current probe is in use, irrespective of how
much current flows, and into what impedance.

Either a limit based on current is verified using a current probe, in which
case the transfer impedance is immaterial, except to reduce the data, or a
LISN with impedance specified over the frequency range of the requirement is
employed. Many years ago, MIL-STD-461 used the same LISN as for CISPR
measurements, and the LISN was (is) indeed characterized down to 10 kHz.  My
understanding is that CISPR now use a different LISN, and that would need to
be separately characterized.

Finally, keep in mind that VDE limits did go down to 9 kHz, and they added a
250 uH ³add-on² LISN to stabilize the impedance of the CISPR LISN at those
lower frequencies.

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261



From: "McDiarmid, Ralph" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:52:00 -0700
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] question - emission measurements below 150kHz

Dear EMC-PSTC forum members,

Given a need to measure conducted emissions from 150kHz down to 9kHz, would
it be better to: 

1. characterise 50ohm LISN for insertion loss down to 9kHz
2. use a current clamp rated for that frequency and use transfer impedance
to determine dB(uV)

I can see that impedance of 50ohm/50uH LISN could be an issue at frequencies
< 100kHz approx. 

thanks, 

____________________________________________________________________________
___ 

Ralph McDiarmid  |  Schneider Electric   |  Solar Business  |   CANADA  |
Regulatory Compliance Engineering

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to