In message
<CAEY+ZhP=xo6m36mu3odkkmzxq8ma0cb360wphpzsnatt9vs...@mail.gmail.com>,
dated Tue, 5 Nov 2013, EMC Guy <[email protected]> writes:
It starts out very promising, but then it says: "...and that the
equipment will comply with the appropriate rules before delivery to the
buyer...". The eval board will *never* comply with the appropriate
rules, it's the whole point of the board. But I guess the first part
of the sentence is essentially the free-pass I was looking for
It isn't really, for the reason you cite in your first sentence. The
text says the device can be sold on the understanding that it will
comply when delivered. This surely is intended to cover custom-made
equipment where payment or part-payment is agreed to be made before
delivery.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
