In message
<caey+zhpwfgbq9ctmf5rn-dp6a6sr0tauarovia5ch3sd6sx...@mail.gmail.com>,
dated Tue, 5 Nov 2013, EMC Guy <[email protected]> writes:
. Although I'm really holding on to Brian Kunde's interpretation of
apparatus and end-user as described in the Guide for the EMC Directive.
I wouldn't advise that: Brian's interpretation is not shared by others.
The end-user is simply the person who does not pass the product on but
uses it. The definition of apparatus is very broad and an evaluation
board is undoubtedly apparatus.
In view of the fact that thousands of these boards have been supplied
and no-one has reported here a problem with the authorities suggest (but
does not guarantee) that you will have no problem. The Commission is
conducting a strong drive to intensify market surveillance.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
