That's sounds like the battle I had to keep 'forbidden bands' in the 1GHz to 
10GHz range inside a METAL case!  NOTHING worked after the fact, short of 
copper tape around the whole thing, solidly. 

How 'stable' is that tone? You mentioned parasitic oscillation? Anyway to 
dither a clock and see which affects the tone.



--- [email protected] wrote:

From: Derek Walton <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Puzzle
Date:         Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:27:35 -0500

Good day folks,


I'm faced with a challenge that's confusing me a bit, and I'm concerned I'm 
overlooking something.


I have a small box, about 4" by 6" by 2" that contains some Ethernet circuitry. 
Normally there are cables that come and go from this box.


During RE testing, there are several very strong emissions ( above 200 MHz ) 
that exceed all other noise made by the box. As yet, we have not been able to 
link them with any of the anticipated frequencies one would expect. In chasing 
the source down I have taken a number of steps which are:


1) Disconnect all cables except the power.  There was no change on the large 
spikes, other noise came down as anticipated.


2) Added several ferrites on the power cable. No change.


3) Added two feed through type caps at the power entry point. No change.


4) Wrapped the box completely in Aluminium foil. No change.


5) Checked Ambients... Nothing, quiet.


6) Replaced power source. No change.


7) Rotated box, very minor change in amplitude.


This box is a new version of an existing design that does not have the same 
issue and close field probing is very difficult inside the box. My suspicion is 
that a small daughter board is the source, but this cannot be removed from the 
box without destruction. A new box has been ordered build without that board. 
That may not arrive for a few weeks.


In the meantime, can anyone make suggestions about what may cause this noise, 
besides parasitic oscillations/faulty parts, and what radiating mechanisms can 
be uninfluenced with the protection measures I took.


Many thanks,


Derek Walton.
L F Research.





-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to