In message <[email protected]>, dated
Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Amund Westin <[email protected]> writes:
I assume you have to make an evaluation that deals with the consequence
of new EMC requirements and thereafter let a Notified Body make an
opinion. Such an evaluation should only include the spare part.
I don't see that being necessary.
The apparatus itself is already on the marked and new EMC requirements
do not have any impact on it.
That's the point. After the repair, the product's EMC characteristics
are the same as before the failure, and those characteristics are
accepted even though newer equipment has to have different
characteristics. No new testing is required.
But, maybe the evaluation is an easier task if it includes the complete
apparatus.
It would be.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
