In message <[email protected]>, dated Fri, 16 May 2014,
Anthony Thomson <[email protected]> writes:
But... it is said that if a deal seems too good to be true, then it IS
too good to be true. I'd be interested to know if/what the catch is
here. Otherwise, I might just go into the standards brokering business!
;-)
I haven't found the Estonian offers too good to be true. BUT as a member
state of the EU Estonia holds a share of the copyright in ENs, so no
individual can legally emulate their offers, nor re-sell the standards.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
