In message
<beda313b3e2b304ca6a08001bd61c9c00186e49...@ukmb01.mottmac.group.int>,
dated Wed, 11 Jun 2014, "McCallum, Andy" <[email protected]>
writes:
Politics ? Oh dear (or words to that affect)
So as 55012 is harmonised under the EMC directive you could in theory
meet that directive but fail the automotive directive.
No: their scopes are, or should be, mutually exclusive. The point is
that 2 dB isn't going to make the difference between a product that is
safe to use in a car and one that isn't, especially as production units
could vary by more than 2 dB when installed (e.g. due to different
wiring). So there really seems no technical reason for the difference,
but different people and different committees prepared the documents.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
