Re: [PSES] Prop 65 Labeling

[Doug Powell]

Thanks all, It seems that this is not a problem. ‎Although a couple have pointed out that everything has some lead. Of course, as is always the case this is a matter of degrees or ppm.    ‎To be very honest, the continual increase of labeling and warnings to consumers is reminding me of the story of the validusian derg in the short fiction "Protection" by Robert Sheckley. Thanks, - doug Douglas Powell http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01   From: Doug Powell Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:20 PM To: EMC-PSTC Subject: Prop 65 Labeling All, I have what might be thought of as an unusual situation, or maybe not.   For rechargeable battery packs, it is appropriate to use Prop 65 Labeling in a general sense regardless of the actual chemical content of the device?   Stated another way, if a device has labeling stating may contain lead and it does not, is this a problem?    Thanks so much,  - doug Douglas Powell http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01   - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>