Which is why many of these Type Tests should be automated - human testers miss too much stuff during a long-term test. And choose to not live at work for the 15 day tests required for some of the over-loads that must be done on employer's stuff.
Brian From: Richard Nute [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 5:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PSES] Historical question, 7 hours Hi Doug: You are correct. One-half hour to set up, seven hours to test, and one-half hour to record results and take down. Eight-hour day. Works for most equipment. For small equipment, it is a long test. For large equipment (intended for long-term operation), it may be too short. And, the equipment should not be unattended during the test as unanticipated failures can occur. Best regards, Rich - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
