In message <FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48920ADED@ZEUS.cetest.local>,
dated Wed, 27 May 2015, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen"
<g.grem...@cetest.nl> writes:
The link between EN 301 489-x and Class B is there already since 2001
or so.
Yes, but things and thinking change over 14 years.
And was made in purpose, as one cannot limit a Class A radio use to an
industrial environment, as is needed for other Class A product (but for
the dreaded IT products of course).
I don't think that makes sense. Consider an industrial control computer
for a large machine; it would never be used in a residential environment
so can be a Class A product. Now add a Wi-Fi module. What forces it then
to be a Class B product?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
