Letter that appears to be designed to enable more UN/WHO influence over EMC standards.
www.emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal Dunno what to think about this stuff. Much of their basis comes from 15 to 20 year old studies, at least one of which seems to have been recently discredited Personally, prefer to keep my phone close to head - keeps the brain warmer. And am looking at buying some land near the Sunrise HV distribution line (500kV) so that we can bask in SLF 'radiation'. Whom is the bigger idiot - myself or these scientists? Brian - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
