Hi Rich,

Thanks for the feedback.  In the application I have in mind the non-PELV is 
nominal 24VDC.  Obviously this voltage is within PELV limits however the 
cabling for this application is such the 24VDC circuit runs along with 208VAC, 
sharing the same connectors and wire troughs and physical separation is not 
practical.  There is only basic insulation on both 208VAC and 24VDC wiring and 
the connectors do not have any special insulation ratings between contacts.  
I'm not sure if the basic insulation on the 208V together with the basic 
insulation on the 24V wiring would meet the requirement of  maintaining a PELV 
voltage in the event of a single fault on one of the basic insulations or not.  
I'm even less sure of the ability of a single fault in the connector housing to 
maintain PELV voltage.  The source of the 24VDC is a transformer and I've not 
confirmed if it meets the requirements for safety isolating transformer.  This 
is an existing application being reviewed and I'm going on the assumption that 
the 24VDC circuit is not PELV.

The 24VDC circuit does not need to be PELV by itself however it interfaces to a 
PELV circuit via an existing optocoupler.  Physical clearances on the PCB 
layout and optocoupler pins are greater than 3.0mm so no concerns there.  The 
only component in question is the internals of the optocoupler  itself.  The 
opto data sheet does not publish internal clearance specs  on the opto, only 
that it is UL 1577 approved for single protection and the input/output 
isolation voltage is min 5000V @60sec.   So it would seem the opto meets the 
voltage requirements of IEC 60664-1.   I'm just not clear if the UL single 
protection rating is sufficient  for this application.  If it takes a single 
fault to get 208V on the opto and a second fault at the opto to get hazardous 
voltage to the PELV side then perhaps the opto is OK as is in this application. 
 The opto is also available with an IEC60747-5-5 rating with VDE mark as an 
option.  The OEM says the only difference with these optos is an additional 
non-destructive production line voltage test on each opto.

-Dave

From: Richard Nute [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 6:36 PM
To: Nyffenegger, Dave; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PSES] Optos for PELV isolation



Hi Dave:


The optocoupler must be rated for the voltage across the optocoupler.  If the 
high voltage side is subject to transient overvoltages, then the optocoupler 
must be rated to withstand the transient overvoltages.

IEC 60664-1 defines transient withstand voltages for mains circuits.  If the 
high voltage side is 120 volts, then the withstand must be 1500 volts peak.  If 
220, 230, or 240 volts, the withstand must be 2500 volts peak.

If the optocoupler is required to be reinforced (or double) insulation (and it 
most likely is), then the withstand voltages are 2500 volts peak and 4000 volts 
peak.

The clearance across the optocoupler must be at least 0.5 mm for basic 
insulation and 1.5 mm for reinforced insulation for 120 volts.  Clearance must 
be at least 1.5 mm for basic insulation and 3.0 mm for reinforced insulation 
for 220-230-240 volts.  (Creepage cannot be less than clearance).

These numbers may not be the same as specified in 60204, 61558, 60747, or UL 
1577 (but they are close).  IEC 60664-1 is the basic safety standard which all 
other standards must use.  Not all standards committees have followed this 
rule, nor have they necessarily understood IEC 60664 series.


Good luck, and best regards,
Rich



From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Optos for PELV isolation

Hi Folks,

I'm trying to determine the appropriate ratings for optocouplers to meet PELV 
isolation requirements from non-PELV low voltage circuits.  EN 
60204-1:2006+A1:2009 6.4.1 c states "live parts of PELV circuits shall be 
electrically separated from other live circuits. Electrical separation shall be 
not less than that required between the primary and secondary circuits of a 
safety isolating transformer (see IEC 61558-1 and IEC 61558-2-6 );"  The IEC 
61558 standards are written for transformers and I'm not sure how that 
translates into specifications available for optos or to UL 1577 or 
EN/IEC60747-5-5 that some optos are approved to.  I have seen UL reports 
testing optos to UL 1577 "single protection" or and "double protection" 
isolators.  UL 1577 itself doesn't clearly define "single" and "double 
protection"  and I'm currently waiting to hear back from UL on that.

I am using optos to switch on a non-PELV circuit from a PELV circuit.  Does 
anyone know if optos approved to UL 1577 Single protection and/or Double 
protection and/or EN/IEC60747-5-5 meet the EN 60204-1 requirements for PELV 
isolation from non-PELV circuits?

Thanks
-Dave

David P. Nyffenegger, PMP, SM-IEEE
Product Development Manager
Bell and Howell
3791 South Alston Avenue
Durham, NC 27713
Phone: 919.767.6419
Web: www.bellhowell.net<http://www.bellhowell.net/>


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to