HI Rich,

The standard also says 5 second interval between discharges.  And the test must 
be run on 20 samples.  We know UL likes to test.  First  edition of the 
standard is 1984, the test has probably been in there since the beginning.

-Dave

From: Richard Nute [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 1:51 PM
To: Nyffenegger, Dave; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PSES] Optos for PELV isolation


Hi Dave:


"subjected to 50 discharges from a 0.0005 microfarad capacitor that has been 
charged to a potential of 20 kV between the short-circuited input and short 
circuited output terminals."

Okay, 500 pF charged to 20 kV then applied to the opto isolation.  The 
input-to-output capacitance is on the order of 1 pF.  That means nearly the 
full 20 kV is applied across the isolation barrier, and exponentially decays by 
the insulation resistance.  One opto specs the insulation resistance at 100 
Gohms minimum!  Time constant is 500e-9 x 100e+9 or 50000 seconds or 833 
minutes or 13 hours!  Repeated 50 times!  50 days to do the test, at 5 days per 
week, 10 weeks, 2-1/2 months!

I must be missing something.  Test does not make much sense.


Best regards,
Rich





-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to