John:

 

I was thinking more about how the evidence of problems is chewed through an
official bureaucracy. Specifically, how much of a barrier is put up to Joe
Consumer when his computer flutters? If the regulatory agency makes it hard
to register a complaint, or discards complaints for multiple bureaucratic
whims, then how do spec writing groups even know there is a problem?

 

For instance, in the USA, no sane person accepts the official data about
inflation or unemployment rates.

 

Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA

 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Complaint-Driven Immunity

 

In message < <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]>, dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Richard
Nute < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> writes:

 

>In short, does ?no complaints? really indicate no problems?

> 

It indicates no problems prominent enough to come to attention. This is not
liked by hard science but it's the way the world wags. Do you want your
taxes spent on pursuing non-compliant products that no-one has found
defective?

> 

>Carl Sagan:  ?Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.?

 

Yes, this is hard science and no-one in EMC circles denies it. But applying
it to emissions or susceptibility that no-one notices enough to complain
doesn't make economic sense.

--

OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See
<http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk When I turn my back on
the sun, it's to look for a rainbow John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and
Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

 

-

----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

 <http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/>
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

 

Website:   <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:   <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List
rules:  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

Mike Cantwell < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>

David Heald: < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to