Hi Ted,

There are 4 listed under RED, no many.  Thanks Ted!

Regards,

Scott

> On 4 May 2016, at 1:05 AM, Scott Xe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ted,
> 
> There are 4 listed under RED, not many.  Thanks Ted!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
>> On 3 May 2016, at 10:48 PM, Ted Eckert <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Scott, <>
>>  
>> Notified Bodies for the various Directives can be found at the following 
>> link.
>> http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/nando/index.cfm?fuseaction=directive.main
>>  
>> <http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/nando/index.cfm?fuseaction=directive.main>
>>  
>> Ted Eckert
>> Compliance Engineer
>> Microsoft Corporation
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>  
>> The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my 
>> employer.
>>  
>> From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 7:16 AM
>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [PSES] Latest OJEU
>>  
>> Hi Charlie,
>>  
>> Do the existing NBs for R&TTED need to re-apply for RED?  Where to get the 
>> list of NBs specific for RED?
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Scott
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> On 3 May 2016, at 3:08 AM, Charlie Blackham <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>  
>> The RED is different to the other changing directives in that its scope and 
>> technical content are also changed from R&TTE.
>>  
>> The 2014 versions of LVD and EMC state that HS lists for previous directives 
>> may be used and will provide a presumption of conformity – 
>> reference/citation on page 12 of  :  Guidance document on the Low Voltage 
>> Directive transition from 2006/95/EC to 2014/35/EU 
>> <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/13141/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native>
>>  
>> For the RED, only HS listed for RED provide a presumption of conformity, and 
>> if the applicable article 3.2 one is not listed when you want to apply it 
>> then you will have to wait or use an NB. That might be “not acceptable” to 
>> some people, but currently that is the situation and one that may not change.
>>  
>> There is only one NB currently listed for the RED, but this is viewed as a 
>> mistake as the commission should have listed all (those that are accredited) 
>> at the same time. In any case, no RED NB opinions can be issued until 13th 
>> June.
>>  
>> Since the RED guidance is not yet available as a draft, I would advise 
>> sticking with R&TTE (or LVD/EMC) for a while longer.
>>  
>> Regards
>> Charlie
>>  


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to