Hi
All the NBs for the RTTE Directive had to re-apply (and be re-assessed by their 
National Accreditation body) to become NBs for the RED.
Although the EU Commission maintains the NANDO listing, it is the National 
Authorities who forward the details onto the database.  If the NB is accredited 
to ISO/IEC 17020 or ISO/IEC 17065, there is a two week “hold” where any other 
National Authority can ask for more details…  If the NB is accredited to 
ISO/IEC 17025, then more information is needed and a longer holding period is 
required.
The NBs for the RED registered in the UK will be on the NANDO list “within” the 
next two weeks, the UK list has already being uploaded, and we are in the 
“holding” period.
I would expect many more NBs to appear on the NANDO list over the next few 
weeks.
Best Regards
Nick

Nick Hooper
Chairman R&TTE CA / RED CA



From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 03 May 2016 18:27
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Latest OJEU

Hi Ted,

There are 4 listed under RED, no many.  Thanks Ted!

Regards,

Scott

On 4 May 2016, at 1:05 AM, Scott Xe 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Ted,

There are 4 listed under RED, not many.  Thanks Ted!

Regards,

Scott


On 3 May 2016, at 10:48 PM, Ted Eckert 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello Scott,

Notified Bodies for the various Directives can be found at the following link.
http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/nando/index.cfm?fuseaction=directive.main

Ted Eckert
Compliance Engineer
Microsoft Corporation
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my 
employer.

From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 7:16 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Latest OJEU

Hi Charlie,

Do the existing NBs for R&TTED need to re-apply for RED?  Where to get the list 
of NBs specific for RED?

Regards,

Scott



On 3 May 2016, at 3:08 AM, Charlie Blackham 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

The RED is different to the other changing directives in that its scope and 
technical content are also changed from R&TTE.

The 2014 versions of LVD and EMC state that HS lists for previous directives 
may be used and will provide a presumption of conformity – reference/citation 
on page 12 of  :  Guidance document on the Low Voltage Directive transition 
from 2006/95/EC to 
2014/35/EU<http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/13141/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native>

For the RED, only HS listed for RED provide a presumption of conformity, and if 
the applicable article 3.2 one is not listed when you want to apply it then you 
will have to wait or use an NB. That might be “not acceptable” to some people, 
but currently that is the situation and one that may not change.

There is only one NB currently listed for the RED, but this is viewed as a 
mistake as the commission should have listed all (those that are accredited) at 
the same time. In any case, no RED NB opinions can be issued until 13th June.

Since the RED guidance is not yet available as a draft, I would advise sticking 
with R&TTE (or LVD/EMC) for a while longer.

Regards
Charlie


-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not 
the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy or rely 
upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the sender by reply 
e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s). Underwriters 
Laboratories Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability for any errors, 
omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any attachments.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to