Hi (the other) Brian:
> This subject is very interesting to me. If I wanted to > know more, is getting a copy of 62368-1 worth reading > or will I have to wait for the proposed changes to > 60950-1 to come out, or what do you recommend? Sooner or later, you will need 62368-1. And, you should get 62368-2, which explains the rationale for each requirement. And, you can get the ECMA document that compares 62368-1 1st edition to 60950-1, ECMA TR287 (free!). http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/fil es/ECMA-TR/ECMA%20TR-106.pdf While this applies to the 1st edition of 62368-1, it will still provide some useful information as to changes from 60950-1. As far as I know, no more changes to 60950-1. Best regards, Rich - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
