> Why would they need to limit scope to just
business
> machines and the like?   Why couldn't this be
applicable
> to a broad range of electrical equipment, from
television
> receivers to solar inverters?

Traditionally, product safety standards have been
written for a specific product.   Few product
safety practitioners have worked with different
products, so have not seen the common threads
between the different products.  Those that have
seen the common threads are unwilling to step up
to the plate and write standards based on energy
sources rather than on products.  In 1961, James
J. Gibson postulated: 

"Injuries to a living organism can be produced
only by some energy interchange. Consequently, a
most effective way of classifying sources of
injury is according to the forms of physical
energy involved. The analysis can thus be
exhaustive and conceptually clear. Physical energy
is either mechanical, thermal, radiant, chemical,
or electrical."

We could have safety standards based on injury,
such as an electric shock safety standard,
applicable to ALL products.  Most of my colleagues
would object to such a safety standard.

Most safety standards are "inversions of bad
experiences," as colleague Ulrich Sattler said.
Indeed, UL was founded by bad experiences.  


Rich

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to