Could the reason for 'parting thought' be that those subjects require deep understanding, not just a facility for coding? Like the difference between a peer-reviewed paper and a science column in a newspaper?
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England We live in exiting times -----Original Message----- From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic Greetings to Human-unit RalphMcDiarmid, Parting thought - was disappointed that code safety and code test coverage was not pushed to the fore for the 'IoT' and wearables presentations at the 2016 ISPCE. Brian - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
