Jim:

 

You live in a World where accreditations are linked to market success.
People are reassured by a flock of compliance markings on the back of a
widget, even if those people are so dense as to strongly believe CE is the
marking for "China Export."

 

Since the ultimate "product" you want to dominate its market is yourself, it
makes sense to know your customer and motivate him with a warm and fuzzy
feeling about you. When you are flashing your BSEE in the competition of
other BSEE's, I wouldn't hesitate to also make it known that I'm an iNARTE
Certified such and such, and that I'm synergistic, lemon-flavored and play
well with others.

 

You are constantly being evaluated by others (many who will never meet with
or talk to you), and many of them will be mightily impressed that you have
iNARTE credentials and can emboss your iNARTE seal on your weekly reports.
So, why not make them happy, secure and proud to employ you?

 

And seriously, although I have not looked at iNARTE exam questions in a long
time, I know that the exams are tough and I would respect anyone who earned
those credentials. That's not such a bad deal; respect from expert customers
and awe from consumer-grade customers.

 

Regarding EMC accreditation itself, it began similar to a Roman Collegium
and moved under the national aegis of NARTE. Perhaps this is the way of the
World, but NARTE began expanding their accreditation business until EMC was
just a small part of their empire. Then NARTE vastly improved their image
(if not the ability of members to pronounce the acronym) by rebranding as an
international organization, iNARTE. Soon iNARTE sold itself to an Australian
accreditation group with the guaranteed unpronounceable acronym of RABQSA,
and I began to feel like EMC accreditation was just a small brick in
somebody else's ziggurat. The latest development is that RABQSA has
rebranded to Exemplar to avoid strange-name jokes. Still, regardless of the
etymology, Exemplar does provide the only (that I know of) EMC-specific
accreditation credentials World-wide. (Of course, there is another career
path that makes use of EMC skills. This is the NSA directed TEMPEST world
[let's call it the Puzzle Palace's regulatory compliance World], and there
is an Accredited TEMPEST Engineer program [but I don't think they want you
using a neat paper embosser to advertise that]). Hmm, if you are the type of
guy who worries about counting the levels of nested parentheses, you might
be a TEMPEST kind of guy!

 

So sure, sit for the exams and once you pass, you can claim the annual dues
as an employee business expense (same for your IEEE & EMC Society dues [I'm
assuming USA tax structures, YMMV.]). And if you become a consultant, the
credentials may help bolster your image as a professional in tax matters
such as an Office-in-Home situation.

 

Ed Price
Ex-iNARTE Certified EMC This J

Ex-iNARTE Certified EMC That J
Chula Vista, CA USA



From: Pawson, James 
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] iNARTE EMC accreditation - thoughts?

 

Hello fellow engineers,

 

With an eye on the future, I am considering taking an iNARTE EMC
qualification. Specifically, I'm considering one (or possibly both) of these
accreditations.

 

.         iNARTE EMC Design Engineer Certification

.         iNARTE Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC/EMI) Certification

 

I'm looking for your advice and experience of

 

.         Gaining these qualifications

.         Views of the engineering community on the worth of these
qualifications

.         Suggestions as to which one of these would be most beneficial for
a career in EMC either working as a company employee or as a
contractor/consultant in EMC testing and design

 

I appreciate these are open questions and I would appreciate any and all
opinions. If you feel more comfortable replying off list then please do.

 

Thanks and regards,

James Pawson

 

Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to