Hi Brian:

 

I have only a passing familiarity with the type of requirements that you are
asking about, but I can offer a few tidbits.

 

For telecom carrier equipment, requirement GR-63-CORE (2012) requires a
filter on all fan-cooled equipment, and contains requirements for the
filtering ability of the filter, ease-of-replacement, and fire resistance.
For the tests on filtering ability, GR-63-CORE references "ASHRAE 52.1
(1992)" and "ANSI/ASHRAE 52.2 (2007)."

 

For the fire resistance tests, GR-63-CORE calls out UL 900 (2004).  

 

I do not have copies of the ASHRAE standards or UL 900, so I can't readily
check to see what they say.

 

I should mention that at engineering conferences for telecom equipment, the
vendor display area usually has one or two vendors that specialize in
GR-63-CORE compliant filter arrangements.  I can't recall the vendor names I
have seen, but a little google searching will likely turn them up.  

 

 

Joe Randolph

Telecom Design Consultant

Randolph Telecom, Inc.

781-721-2848 (USA)

 <mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com> j...@randolph-telecom.com

 <http://www.randolph-telecom.com> http://www.randolph-telecom.com

 

From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 12:43 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Risk Assessment of Air Filter

 

I seek advice and opinions from fellow safety minded people.

 

Our typical product has a metal chassis which is constructed as a Fire
Enclosure (laboratory equipment 61010-1). On the back is a cutout for a
cooling fan/blower mounted in the cutout. The fan is 24Vdc, certified by
several safety agencies, and has a finger guard.  This is typical
configuration on most electronics.

 

Now, our customers want us to install an externally changeable Air Filter on
the outside surface of our instrument where the fan is mounted to filter
dust particles from the incoming air. We already perform Blocked Vent and
Stalled Fan tests to insure no hazards are caused from the rise in internal
temperatures.  

 

But what type of Fault Testing or Risk assessment needs to be done regarding
the filter?  With the filter removed, the instrument passes the construction
requirements for a Fire Enclosure. But with the filter installed and because
of its close proximity to the fan/blower;

1.        does this filter have to meet Flammability requirements? Does the
filters have to be certified (expensive)? UL 94 HF-1?, UL 94 HF-2?, UL 900?
How are these ratings/certifications viewed outside of North America?  Will
they have to meet local requirements??

2.       If the fan/blower is certified and limited energy circuit does the
filter have to have any kind of rating or certification? In other words,
with a certified fan/blower, do I have to consider the fault condition of
the fan failing in a way where it could catch the filter on fire?  

3.       How is a fault and/or risk assessment performed on an air filter? 

4.       Are we responsible to consider the hazards from a burning filter
when it is dirty? How would we know what type of contaminates might collect
in a filter?  

5.       If the filter we provide is UL 94 HF-1 and UL 900 rated/certified,
what would stop our customer from replacing it with whatever filter they
wanted? Are we responsible to include a warning label and statements in the
manual regarding this?  Example, "Use only Air Filter part number XYZ". 

6.       Any other suggestions or issues that we are not considering?  

 

Thanks in advance. Have a nice day.


The Other Brian

  _____  


LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this
by mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to