Backing up the others, if you look at electrical outlets designed for Al
wiring, the part that accepts house wiring has a sort of "scaled" surface
rather than smooth, to grab the Al wire securely and also likely punch
through oxide.

The above is fact.  I conjecture that the reason for the difference between
the quoted AL wire resistance and copper vs. 1.5 is that they wouldn't be
using pure Al, but some alloy.

Finally, I seem to dimly remember that Al wire gauges were different than
for Cu wire, to at least partially make up for the difference in
conductivity.

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261


> From: Richard Nute <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:34:56 -0800
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PSES] aluminum vs copper wiring
> 
> The coefficients of expansion are sufficiently
> different between aluminum and traditional wiring
> devices that connections would go loose over time,
> yielding a resistive connection and fire.
> 
> The outer surface of aluminum is aluminum oxide, a
> non-conductor.  To make a low-resistance
> electrical connection, the termination must break
> through the oxide.  (Oxidation is almost
> instantaneous; welding of aluminum must be done in
> an inert atmosphere.)
> 
> Best wishes for the holiday season,
> Rich
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ralph McDiarmid
>> [mailto:Ralph.McDiarmid@SCHNEIDER-
>> ELECTRIC.COM]
>> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 11:50 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [PSES] aluminum vs copper wiring
>> 
>> I've just come across this statement in a user
> manual for a
>> small inverter product:
>> 
>> "Do not use aluminum. It has about 1/3 more
> resistance
>> than copper cable of the same size, and it is
> difficult to
>> make good,
>> low-resistance connections to aluminum wire"
>> 
>> I think both statements are wrong.  Science Data
> Book by
>> Oliver&Boyd, lists resistivity of aluminum at
> about 1.5X
>> that of copper.  And, I don't see why electrical
> connections
>> would be less reliable using aluminum, although,
> I do
>> remember household wiring in the USA was done
> with Al
>> some years ago with questionable success.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Ralph McDiarmid
>> Product Compliance
>> Engineering
>> Solar Business
>> Schneider Electric
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>>  This message was scanned by Exchange Online
> Protection
>> Services.
>> ________________________________
>> 
>> -
>> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
> Engineering
>> Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a
> message to the
>> list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
>> 
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and
> searchable on the
>> web at:
>> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>> 
>> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES
> Online
>> Communities site at
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
>> can be used for graphics (in well-used formats),
> large files,
>> etc.
>> 
>> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> Instructions:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including
>> how to unsubscribe)
>> List rules:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>> 
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
>> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>> 
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
>> David Heald: <[email protected]>
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
> <[email protected]>
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
> 
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
> formats), large files, etc.
> 
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe)
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to