1. Partly to support their test labs and partly because they are not totally 
satisfied with the IEC standards that specify the tests. Particularly for 
lithium batteries, the technology is evolving far faster than the standards 
committees can change the standards (where/if necessary) and the standards 
can't accommodate new technology while it is undisclosed for commercial 
confidentiality.
 
2. It's not a matter of crossing borders and I doubt there are special EMC 
issues with lithium batteries. But the incidence of fires shows that either the 
basic technology or the manufacturing process, or both, is questionable. While 
that is so, the testing standards cannot be regarded as comprehensive.
 
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
 <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and 
Associates Rayleigh England
 
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
 
From: Vincent Lee [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 8:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] In-Country Testing
 
 
Hi all,
 
Happy 2017,
 
Having read about IECEE CB Scheme in which over 50 countries are participating 
members who agreed to mutually recognize each other CB test reports and 
certificates, may I know 
 
1) What is the reasons or rationale between the requirements of In-Country Test 
(EMC, Safety Test) by some countries (e.g. PRC China, South Korea and Taiwan 
for EMC, India and Thailand for Li-ion Battery Safety Test)?
 
2) Will the product operating principle and behavior (e.g. Li-ion battery 
electro-chemistry) changed significant so as to cause EMC and safety issues 
when they cross the borders from one country to another ?
 
Hope to hear from you soon. 
 
Thank you and Happy 2017 ahead.
 
Vincent 
 
 
 
Regards, Vincent
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to