Internal company standards do not exist to solely ensure compliance with any particular standard, so "pros and cons" are not relevant. While there is some overlap, the two sets of requirements are not all coincident.
IEC62133, as a product safety standard, is not adequate for the scoped equipment and is incomplete; but it is a reference for a starting point. Brian From: Vincent Lee [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2017 7:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [PSES] Li-ion Battery Testing Standards Hi all, Given the Samsung smartphone galaxy 7 recall due to unsafe Li-ion battery in 2016, may I know are there any clauses in the current IEC 62133-2:2017 (https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/32662) to address such issue ? What are the differences between Samsung 8-Point Battery Safety Check and IEC 62133-2:2017 ? In your opinion, and what are the pros and cons of each testing methods / standards ? Hope to hear from you soon. Thank you very much. Regards, Vincent - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
