Yes, EN 55035 is listed under the RED, but there is no docopocoss for 55020 cited, possibly because 55020 was never cited under the RED.  So the only place to look for the docopocoss is the EMC list, I suggest. Otherwise it's in a sort of limbo.

John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK

On 2018-06-21 17:28, Charlie Blackham wrote:

Scott

Sound and Broadcast receivers fall under the scope of the RED (it was one of the changes from the R&TTE Directive), as such:

  * They don’t fall under the EMC Directive
  * There are no longer HS for them under the EMC Directive
  * There is now a HS for them under the RED

Whilst you aren’t required to apply a Harmonised Standard, please note the requirement of Article 34 which applies if you are using a NB:

Where a notified body finds that the essential requirements set out in Article 3 or corresponding harmonised standards or other technical specifications have not been met by a manufacturer, it shall require that manufacturer to take appropriate corrective measures and shall not issue an EU-type examination certificate or a quality system approval

So if you haven’t applied a listed Harmonised Standard and are requesting a Type Examination Certificate that covers article 3.1(b), then you need to show that the product has a level of EMC performance equivalent to the technical levels shown in the HS

Regards

Charlie

*Charlie Blackham*

*Sulis Consultants Ltd*

*Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*

*Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com* <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>

Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

*From:*Scott Xe <[email protected]>
*Sent:* 21 June 2018 16:58
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED products in EMC compliance part

Pete,

Both you and Charlie share the esteemed and fair opinions that using other than harmonised standards is not a wise decision although it is allowed by the directive.  I have the same perception since we have no control in this route due to limited knowledge.  Will see how to stick to harmonised standards.

The test lab insisted on that EN 55020 is till valid in demonstrating EMC compliance although RED already has a new harmonised standard and it disappears in EMC list.  So far both the test lab and we cannot find any support to this claim.

Regards,

Scott

On 21 June 2018 at 23:18, Pete Perkins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Scott et al,

                   Charlie is right; no matter what promise you get
    from your 3^rd party NB they are not in ultimate control.  You, as
    manufacturer, are at the mercy of the regulators.  It is important
    for you & your company to keep the heat on so that there is a
    reasonable expectation that the work that has been done will be
    acceptable moving ahead.

    :>)     br,      Pete

    Peter E Perkins, PE

    Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant

    PO Box 23427

    Tigard, ORe  97281-3427

    503/452-1201

    IEEE Life Fellow

    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    *From:*Scott Xe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Sent:* Thursday, June 21, 2018 7:25 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


    *Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED products in EMC compliance part

    Hi Charlie,

    Many thanks for your kind advice!!

    As the conformity review of this product is required by a NB, it
    is quite difficult to challenge their result due to their status
    but we can require them to issue a confirmation of continual
    compliance with the latest essential requirements of RED on the
    repeat orders.

    Regards,

    Scott

    On 21 June 2018 at 02:46, Charlie Blackham
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Scott

        I understand the issue you describe, however it should be
        remembered that:

          * The manufacturer is always responsible , whoever advises
            them. If they are going to ask a 3^rd party (lab or
            consultant) then they should satisfy themselves that the
            advice is correct, perhaps by asking what the
            recommendation is based on.
          * A test lab cannot issue a “Declaration of Conformity” only
            a manufacturer (or suitably contracted representative) can
            do that – test labs should (only) issue “Certificates of
            Conformity” as a summary of test results, which are not
            the same thing
          * Copying someone else who got it wrong isn’t much of a defence

        In my experience, you should be prepared for challenges from
        market surveillance if you don’t apply Harmonised Standards
        (but whether you actually get challenged may be down to luck
        and whether your product type has been selected for market
        surveillance activity)

        Regards

        Charlie

        *Charlie Blackham*

        *Sulis Consultants Ltd*

        *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*

        *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com*
        
<https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>

        Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

        *From:*Scott Xe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Sent:* 20 June 2018 17:31
        *To:* Charlie Blackham <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Cc:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED products in EMC compliance part

        Hi Charlie,

        Understand that the manufacturer is free to choose any
        conformity assessment to meet the essential requirements for
        EMC without using a Notified Body. However the manufacturer
        must have expert in this area to provide the appropriate
        advice.  Most of oem manufacturers lack of such luxury
        resource and reply on renowned test houses to do it for them.
        Can we use the declaration of conformity from the test lab for
        selecting the right test standards for EMC part even those
        standards are not in RED and EMC harmonized lists.  Would we
        receive extra challenges from the market surveillances due to
        the fact that we use non harmonized standards.

        Thanks and regards,

        Scott

        On 21 June 2018 at 00:12, Charlie Blackham
        <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Scott

            EN 55035 is the (only) article 3.1(b) EMC standard that is
            Harmonised for broadcast receivers under the RED.

            As per RED article 17, the manufacturer is free to choose
            any conformity assessment to meet the essential
            requirements for EMC without using a Notified Body, but:

              * Your approach to EMC needs to be considered in your
                Risk Assessment (whether or not a Harmonised Standard
                is applied)
              * Market enforcement and customs would “expect” to see
                Harmonised Standards such as EN 55035:2017 listed on
                the DoC

            If the DAB radio contains Bluetooth then EN 301 489-1 and
            -17 would also apply, though these won’t be in the OJ
            until Q4 2017 or Q1 2018

            Regards

            Charlie

            *Charlie Blackham*

            *Sulis Consultants Ltd*

            *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*

            *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com*
            
<https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>

            Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

            *From:*Scott Xe <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
            *Sent:* 20 June 2018 16:05
            *To:* [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* [PSES] RED products in EMC compliance part

            Dear All,

            We have a DAB radio with BT speaker.  It held NB a cert
            using EN 55032 : 2015,  EN 55020 : 2007 + A12 : 2016, …. 
            for EMC part compliance last year. Currently we are
            reviewing the continual compliance. It is discovered that
            both EN 55032 and EN 55020 disappears in the latest list
            of EMC harmonized standard list.  In RED harmonized
            standard list, there is a new harmonized standard EN
            55035.  Is it in need of meeting EN 55035 : 2017 instead
            of EN 55020 : 2007 to maintain the continual compliance of
            RED?

            Thanks and regards,

            Scott

            -
            ----------------------------------------------------------------

            This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
            Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the
            list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>

            All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the
            web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

            Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online
            Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
            can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large
            files, etc.

            Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
            Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
            (including how to unsubscribe)
            List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

            For help, send mail to the list administrators:
            Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
            Mike Cantwell <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>

            For policy questions, send mail to:
            Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
            David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    -
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
    emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
    e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

    Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities
    site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for
    graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

    Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/>
    Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
    unsubscribe)
    List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

    For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    For policy questions, send mail to:
    Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html <http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ <http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to