Hi Charlie, Deeply appreciate your further advice!!
Best regards, Scott On 22 June 2018 at 20:26, Charlie Blackham <[email protected]> wrote: > Scott > > > > *[CB] comments* below > > > > Regards > > Charlie > > > > *Charlie Blackham* > > *Sulis Consultants Ltd* > > *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317* > > *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com* > <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f> > > Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 > > > > *From:* Scott Xe <[email protected]> > *Sent:* 22 June 2018 11:55 > *To:* Charlie Blackham <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED products in EMC compliance part > > > > Hi Charlie, I am not fully catching up your points. Could you please give > some insights of the points highlighted below. Thanks! > > > > On 22 June 2018 at 00:28, Charlie Blackham <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Scott > > > > Sound and Broadcast receivers fall under the scope of the RED (it was one > of the changes from the R&TTE Directive), as such: > > - They don’t fall under the EMC Directive > - There are no longer HS for them under the EMC Directive - Scott: Are > we sure EU has taken out all EMC HS re receivers? RED does not have > enough HS for EMC without referencing to EMC HS. > - There is now a HS for them under the RED - Scott: Currently only > have one! What is correct practice for the field to select EMC standards? > It is not governed by the NB review! > > *[CB] The manufacturer is free to choose what standards to apply:* > > - *Where the product is “just” a radio, then the latest ETSI standards > would be a good starting point, and they can all be found at > **https://goo.gl/5nseKp > <https://goo.gl/5nseKp>* > - *Where the product is a “non-radio product with a radio”, then the > above applies along with EMCD standard for the non-radio part. More > information on this in * > > > - *ETSI EG 203 367 v1.1.1: > > http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_eg/203300_203399/203367/01.01.01_60/eg_203367v010101p.pdf > > <http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_eg/203300_203399/203367/01.01.01_60/eg_203367v010101p.pdf>* > - *Draft ETSI EN 303 446-1 V1.1.0: > > http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/303400_303499/30344601/01.01.00_20/en_30344601v010100a.pdf > > <http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/303400_303499/30344601/01.01.00_20/en_30344601v010100a.pdf>* > - *Draft ETSI EN 303 446-2 V1.1.0: > > http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/303400_303499/30344602/01.01.00_20/en_30344602v010100a.pdf > > <http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/303400_303499/30344602/01.01.00_20/en_30344602v010100a.pdf>* > > > > > > Whilst you aren’t required to apply a Harmonised Standard, please note the > requirement of Article 34 which applies if you are using a NB: > > > > Where a notified body finds that the essential requirements set out in > Article 3 or corresponding harmonised standards or other technical > specifications have not been met by a manufacturer, it shall require that > manufacturer to take appropriate corrective measures and shall not issue an > EU-type examination certificate or a quality system approval - Scott: > Under RED, EU-type examination cert is required for article 3.2 only. Will > the NB also look after 3.1a and b? > > *[CB] The NB should look at whatever you ask them to. You may request > everything; article 3.2 only; 3.2 and 3.1(b); 3.2 and 3.1(b) and 3.1(a)EMF > etc.* > > > > So if you haven’t applied a listed Harmonised Standard and are requesting > a Type Examination Certificate that covers article 3.1(b), then you need to > show that the product has a level of EMC performance equivalent to the > technical levels shown in the HS - Scott: Unless EN 55035 is a relax > version of EN 55020, how can the manufacturer/test lab to show a level of > EMC performance equivalent to the technical levels shown in the HS? > > *[CB] With careful consideration, not a short answer, but in this instance > the HS would be probably be the best approach* > > > > Regards > > Charlie > > > > > > *Charlie Blackham* > > *Sulis Consultants Ltd* > > *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317* > > *Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com* > <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f> > > Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 > > > > > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
