Gert, Note 55032 has replaced 55022 in EMC HS but not in RED. Suppose 55035 and 55032 are a pair of EMS and EMI for MME. Any particular reason?
Regards, Scott On 22 June 2018 at 21:03, Gert Gremmen <[email protected]> wrote: > It IS far behind. This step was made just to stop the delay. > > Virtually all standards will go through this step, as all LVD/EMCD > standards need to include > > radio products in their scope, ETSI standards will need to include > receiver parameter . > > Do not expect many technical changes in EMCD and LVD standards however, but > > the changes already discussed in this thread. (55020->55035 55022->55032) > > > Gert Gremmen > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
