All,         This discussion goes around  year after year.  

 

               The test results reported – especially Nute – show that it takes 
dozens, maybe  hundreds of hipot tests to damage adequate insulation.  

 

               In the UK, so I hear, the gov’t safety folks expect each piece 
of equipment to be hipot retested annually to demonstrate adequate insulation.  
We don’t hear a large hue and cry about failing equipment in that arena.  

 

               So from the experience and the data it is clear that both the 
engineering type hipot testing and the factory routine testing should not pose 
any problem to properly designed and manufactured products.  

 

               For line connected products it is foolishness to remove 
components for hipot testing.  If that is being done the product is not robust 
enough in the first place.  This includes DC line powered equipment since so 
much DC power is being installed and used in places where it is subject to the 
same lighting and starting impulses traditionally seen on AC line operated 
equipment.   

 

:>)     br,      Pete

 

Peter E Perkins, PE

Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant

PO Box 23427

Tigard, ORe  97281-3427

 

503/452-1201

 

IEEE Life Fellow

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 

From: Jim Hulbert <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 5:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] hipot test

 

I disagree with your NRTL.  If the hipot test can degrade the insulation (we’re 
talking about a single test on the production line), then the insulation system 
is not up to par.  

 

Jim


 

 

From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 12:18 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] hipot test

 

The NRTL I typically use always runs the hipot test for 60 seconds for type 
testing during product certification.  The listing reports always specify a 1 
second hipot for production line testing 100% of all units.  Their claim is 
that the hipot can degrade some insulation and should be kept to a minimum.

 

-Dave

 

From: Richard Nute [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 5:34 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [PSES] hipot test

 

 

Hi Doug:

 

I've always viewed the purpose of hipot testing as verification only.  During 
engineering type testing, it is design verification. 

 

I disagree.  The hi-pot test determines the minimum electric strength of the 
insulation system.  Design is an indirect measure of electric strength by 
selecting the distances through solid and air (clearance) insulations.  
However, design rarely includes the shape of the electric field, which is a 
parameter that determines electric strength.  

 

Since hipot is so stressful to insulation…

 

Again, I disagree.  If the design is “good” (adequate electric strength), then 
the hi-pot test does not stress the insulation system.  See Agilent 
Technologies Optocoupler Input-Output Endurance Voltage Application Note 1074.

 

Best regards,

Rich

 

 

 

From: Doug Powell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 1:50 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] X & Y Cap rating due to hipot test

 

I've always viewed the purpose of hipot testing as verification only.  During 
engineering type testing, it is design verification.  During routine testing 
for manufacturing, it is workmanship and build verification.  

 

During type testing many safety standards will ask for hipot verification at 
various stages, after thermal/humidity tests, after abnormal operations, etc.  
Since hipot is so stressful to insulation, it is possible to introduce latent 
failures in the test sample after performing multiple hipot tests, combining 
many hipots into one is allowable by many inspectors.  

 

During routine testing, a brief hipot is added at the end of the manufacturing 
cycle to ensure wire routing is correct (spacings are maintained), integrity of 
insulation is maintained, in cases where vibration testing is involved a test 
for chafing of wire insulation and so on.  Most safety standards have provision 
for "allowable disconnects" during the hipot such as surge suppressors and the 
like.  Also, hipot of sub-assemblies in lieu of the finished assembly if it can 
be shown that the test is representative.  

 

Best to all, Doug

 

-- 

 

Douglas E Powell

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01

 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to