John, Thanks for your view! I fully agree with you that both EN 60065 & EN 60950-1 are coming to EoL. However many managements of supply chain have not begun the switch. Probably next year will be a turning point.
Best regards, Scott On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 01:17, John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree; even internal fixed batteries should be marked. The markings are > for service technicians and recycling people, not just users. > > But 60065 and 60950-1 are nearly dead. You should look at 62368-1. > > Best wishes > John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only > J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk > Rayleigh, Essex UK > > On 2019-02-20 17:06, Scott Xe wrote: > > The end product safety standards EN 60065 & EN 60950-1 consider the > compliance if lithium-ion rechargeable battery meets EN 62133. EN 62133 > asks for some rating markings and WEEE and battery Directives also ask for > recycle symbols. For individual selling on battery cells and packs, they > must comply with all markings. The users can reference to those markings > for safe use of those components. For end products such as clock radios, > wireless headphones, etc., the battery is bulit into the unit and not > allowed to be replaced or repaired by the customers. The markings are not > useful for the customers so those components are often NOT included all the > markings. Is it considered not to fully comply with EN 62133? Should the > end product be sufficient to comply with the markings specified by EN 60065 > or EN 60950-1 only? > > Since the end products have to be separated from household waste and the > rechargeable battery are required to be separated from household waste and > normal EEE waste, how can it be presented to the customers without leading > the confusion? > > Thanks and regards, > > Scott > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc > discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to < > [email protected]> > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at > http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in > well-used formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to > unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas <[email protected]> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher <[email protected]> > David Heald <[email protected]> > > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
