Out of that long email, I selected the text below. I know Ed was writing
about the past, but things have changed, not enough yet but quite a
bit. Compliance (EMC and safety) must be designed-in. Imposing
compliance on a 'finished' design causes delay, maybe even fatal delay,
and avoidable increased costs. This inevitably means that design
engineers DO need to know the standards and the test process, 'well
enough' at least. The test house would normally know more about both,
due to more varied experience, much better than 'well enough'.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-04-18 19:18, Edward Price wrote:
*I didn’t expect my customer to be an expert in either the standard or
the test process.*
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
