Is it possible to ask the inspector to give publication and clause
references to the claimed provisions?
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-07-23 01:11, Doug Powell wrote:
An interesting requirement came up today on a system that uses wheels
for mobility. The inspector says clause 7.4 requires "... the unit be
stable in the upright orientation, with wheels augmented with
floor-braces or other such parts as necessary such that each wheel or
brace can withstand four times the weight normally applied to it and
the unit will remain stable and upright if any wheel or support is
removed or broken." This is the exact wording in the letter report.
I have no problem with stability requirements but I checked the third
edition of UL 61010-1 and the national differences. I found nothing
like this statement in the standard. It didn't even mention the words
wheels or castors. I am familiar with the four times requirements for
handles, lifting rings and the like but not for wheels in particular.
Also, I do know about various topple tests and the like are performed
but a broken wheel or broken support test?
This made me wonder if the certifying agency has internal requirements
or possibly the inspector is confusing wheel requirements from IEC
60601-1 for "transportable equipment" .
Does anyone know where the above may have originated?
Thanks everyone!
Doug
--
Douglas E Powell
[email protected]
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01
Currently out of the office and working from my Android phone
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities
site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
