It may be possible except my client is the producer selling the product on wheels. The inspector is certifying the end product of which this device is only a large component. I really don't want to challenge them straight away and possibly sour the relations between my client and their customer. In any case, I'm beginning to suspect this may be an internally circulated technical information letter or engineering judgement at the agency. There are three other observations I need to deal with and we should be done. This stability requirement is the one that seems just a bit weird. Tis a complicated world we live in, eh? Thanks, Doug
Is it possible to ask the inspector to give
publication and clause references to the claimed provisions? Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK On 2019-07-23 01:11, Doug Powell wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ For help, send mail to the list administrators: For policy questions, send mail to: |
- [PSES] UL 61010-1 7.4 stabilty Doug Powell
- Re: [PSES] UL 61010-1 7.4 stabilty Richard Nute
- Re: [PSES] UL 61010-1 7.4 stabilty Doug Powell
- Re: [PSES] UL 61010-1 7.4 stabilty John Woodgate
- Re: [PSES] UL 61010-1 7.4 stabilty Doug Powell
- Re: [PSES] UL 61010-1 7.4 stabilty John Woodgate