Hi Charlie,

 

The last presentation from ETSI that I recall on the topic, stated that we
should be looking at EN 301 489-1 V2.x.x and newer.   We should not be
considering the old EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2 because that is simply not
sufficient for the RED.

 

Thanks,

 

Michael.

 

 

From: Charlie Blackham <[email protected]> 
Sent: 17 September 2019 13:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B

 

Gert

 

EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2 was published in 2011 and is quite old now

 

As you know, EN 301 489-1 V2.1.1 was published by ETSI in February 2017 and
the latest draft, V2.2.0 was issued by ETSI in March 2019 - both contain
radiated immunity requirements to 6 GHz, which are more extensive than those
in V1.9.2, and both contain the Class A option for emissions, though with
slightly different wording

 

As far as I know, V1.9.2 won't ever be cited under the RED  - though nor
will V2.1.1 - and the communication from ETSI suggest that the issues in
V2.2.0 mainly revolve around equipment performance monitoring and criteria
and not the Class A/B option for appropriate end environments

 

Are you suggesting that V1.9.2 is a better standard to apply under the RED
than either V2.1.1 or V2.2.0?

 

I also know that you're involved in the process of standard being published
in the OJ, so any further light you can shed on this matter would be greatly
appreciated

 

Regards

Charlie

 

Charlie Blackham

Sulis Consultants Ltd

Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317

Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ 

Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

 

From: Gert Gremmen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: 17 September 2019 11:56
To: Charlie Blackham <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B

 

Hi Charlie

That version of the standard 301-489-1 V2.2.1 has not yet been approved, yet
published, so be careful....

For now keep relying on V1.9.2 , that does not mention your text  on
industrial environment, and that has not yet been cited under the RED
either.

Gert Gremmen

On 17-9-2019 10:59, Charlie Blackham wrote:

You can use Class A for industrial locations under EN 301 489-1:

 

8.2.3 Limits

The ancillary equipment shall meet the class B limits given in CENELEC EN
55032 [1], annex A tables A.4 and A.5.

Alternatively, for ancillary equipment intended to be used exclusively in an
industrial environment or telecommunication centres, the class A limits
given in CENELEC EN 55032 [1], annex A tables A.2 and A.3 may be used.

 

If the screen is "ancillary equipment", another EMC standard can be used as
per section 5.4, though it is more likely to be "combined and/or integrated
radio and non-radio equipment" so the advice in EN 303 446-x can be followed

 

 

Also, of course, a RED Notified Body (NB) is only required where the
applicable article 3.2 or 3.3 Harmonised Standard is not used

The manufacturer is free to choose the EMC and safety standard without use
of NB if they wish

 

 

 

Charlie Blackham

Sulis Consultants Ltd

Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317

Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ 

Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

 

From: Gert Gremmen  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> 
Sent: 17 September 2019 09:01
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B

 

Note that for intentional transmitters the EMCD en LVD are not applicable
(but the RED is!). And so are the standards listed for them.

Probably as this is a transceiver with ancillary equipment (though heavily
integrated?) the  combi EN 301489-17/EN 301 489-1 will be applicable.

The latter limits the emission Class to Class B (for ancillary electronics)
only and refers to EN 55032 as test method.

Note that RED standards are prone to changes in the close future, make sure
you have the last version and re-check if another version may be listed

(cited) in the OJ-L. Use a Notified Body otherwise.

Gert Gremmen

On 17-9-2019 8:48, John Woodgate wrote:

Not exactly. The question was strictly about 'Class', which of course can
mean different things in different standards, but my answer is, I think,
correct for Europe. Intentional radiation is excluded from the CISPR
standards and is covered by the ETSI standards cited by Charlie Blackham.

Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk <http://www.woodjohn.uk> 
Rayleigh, Essex UK

On 2019-09-16 23:55, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:

John, 

 

Are you saying that a product with intentional radiator only needs to meet
Class A for emissions in EU? i.e there is no difference in terms of the
limit between intentional and unintentional radiators when it comes to EU.
Is that a correct statement?

 

Thanks

Peter



-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
To: peterhays  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>; EMC-PSTC
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 11:34 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B

That should be CISPR 35, not CISPR 24 now. In Europe, it would be Class A.
The manual should say 'This product is not to be used in a residential
environment.'.

Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk <http://www.woodjohn.uk> 
Rayleigh, Essex UK

On 2019-09-16 17:56, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:

The product is an ITE and follows CISPR 32 and CISPR 24

It will be sold globally 

 

The product is a small touch panel.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
To: peterhays  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>; EMC-PSTC
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 12:37 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Intentional radiator Class A or Class B

To give a reliable answer, we need to know the type of product or the EMC
emission standard that applies (e.g. CISPR 14-1/EN 55014-1) and which
countries/regions it will be sold in.

Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk <http://www.woodjohn.uk> 
Rayleigh, Essex UK

On 2019-09-16 03:51, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

I have a client that design and manufacture products for use in
non-residential environment. This product consists of a BT module. I am told
that the product must meet Class B emissions. Is this correct? What if we
put an statement in the user manual stating that this product is not to be
used in residential market? Would that give us the pass to go to Class A?

 

Thank you all

Peter

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-- 
Independent Expert on CE marking 
Harmonised Standards (HAS-) Consultant @ European Commission for RED and EMC
EMC Consultant
Electrical Safety Consultant

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-- 
Independent Expert on CE marking 
Harmonised Standards (HAS-) Consultant @ European Commission for RED and EMC
EMC Consultant
Electrical Safety Consultant

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to