All Is there a clause/requirement in 61010-1 similar to 60950-1 clause 2.1.1.5 where a SELV source >240 VA is not permitted to be accessible in an Operator Area
The specific example I'm looking at is a pair of rack mounted units where the
10V/40A output has been paralleled with a 2nd unit in the rack using 10cm of
copper bar.
When considered as single units, the DC terminals and exposed conductor are
covered by a rubber boot, but this is not the case when they are ganged up
[Unit 1 10V 0V, Unit 2
10V 0V]
The device is currently installed in a 600mm deep rack - my thoughts are that
it should be in a 800mm deep rack so that access can be restricted by a rear
panel or similar - but I can't find the clause in the standard that requires
this.
Regards
Charlie
Charlie Blackham
Sulis Consultants Ltd
Mead House
Longwater Road
Eversley
RG27 0NW
UK
Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
image002.emz
Description: image002.emz
image003.emz
Description: image003.emz
