The NFPA is acutely aware of this opinion and considers it an existential crisis. They have been sending out communications for years to their membership making the case that NFPA codes should not be free and the fees paid for them go directly towards improving safety. Just one example:
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Publications-and-media/Sign-up-for-NFPA-Network/Newsletter-main/NFPA-Network-August-2020 -Ken A. On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:00 AM Douglas Powell <[email protected]> wrote: > My Friday Question, > > NFPA Codes, law or not? Officially the answer is, "No, these are not > laws." > > I recently saw a clarification stating: > > "*As a national consensus safety standard, NFPA 70 is not a law and it > has not been incorporated into the Code of Federal Regulations. Therefore, > compliance is not deemed mandatory. Even so, OSHA has cited NFPA 70 in > cases where lack of compliance has resulted in a workplace accident*." > > > The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) is a nonprofit > organization and not a government entity. In the USA, possibly the best > known published document is the NFPA 70 which is the National Electric Code > or NEC ®. And indeed, this code has been translated and adopted in other > countries in places like Latin America > <https://www.nfpa.org/NEC/NEC-adoption-and-use/NEC-adoption-and-use-in-Latin-America>. > Nevertheless, in my view, the whole system is bordering on becoming a > legal requirement, especially at the local level where Authorities Having > Jurisdiction (AHJs) adopt these into their local city and county codes. > > Occasionally a discussion is raised on electrical forums where someone > wants to point out that in this country any code which is officially > mandated law must be freely available for public use. NFPA does indeed > offer a "free view" but these are very deficient with regard to usability. > > The question then becomes, "Should these codes be law? > > Food for thought... > > Doug > > -- > > Douglas E Powell > > [email protected] > http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01 > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc > discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to < > [email protected]> > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at > http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in > well-used formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to > unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas <[email protected]> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher <[email protected]> > David Heald <[email protected]> > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
