I seem to remember this subject being extensively discussed about two years ago. The bans on 'alien' cords are indeed enforced, and some authorities were extremely unhelpful in finding solutions, e.g. not allowing products to be shipped without cords, which were added in the country of destination.  Some contributed solutions for specific countries that were found to work.

On 2023-08-11 15:52, Douglas Powell wrote:
I believe you are correct.

Simply shipping the wrong cord types to certain locations is actually prohibited, and in general, including incorrect types could be viewed as endorsement of their use in other areas. A thing that should be simple, now gets complicated.

On occasion, I've heard manufacturers say things like "/I've heard of this but have no official knowledge that it's true/", as a way to side step liability. I'm not certain this is considered a valid argument, should someone be injured.

While it's convenient and sometimes cost effective to make shipping kits more generic, I usually recommend including in BOMs some indicator of the ISO Alpha-2 or ISO Alpha-3 country code and make kits so the correct materials are included for the location involved.

I find that, although seemingly simple, it's very easy to get tripped up over such matters. I've also had difficulty in the past with multi-language labeling, i.e. combined language labels. In certain countries people become offended if the wrong language is on products along side their own language. In this case I'm thinking of a 4-language label I once used.

Best regards, Doug

Douglas E Powell
Laporte, Colorado USA

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023, 8:27 AM Chas Grasso <charles.gra...@dish.com> wrote:

    Hello Doug - Wow I had no idea that this issue existed. Thanks for
    bringing it up!
    As I understand that the inclusion of incorrect cords in a package
    spreads the incorrect
    conclusion that ALL of the cords are suitable for use. Did I get
    that right?


    On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 8:00 AM Douglas Powell <doug...@gmail.com>
    wrote:

        *

         This message originated outside of DISH and was sent by:
        doug...@gmail.com

        *
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        All,

        I was talking with a client recently about shipping line cords
        to various countries around the world and how some do not
        allow the incorrect cords within a shipment while others do.
        Brazil, as far as I know, does not permit incorrect cordage.
        Argentina, Australia, and China (PRC) are all mutually
        exclusive. South Africa and India are mutually exclusive.
        Japan, Taiwan, and the United States are all mutually
        exclusive. If not prohibited, it is frequently cheaper to
        include multiple cords rather than create multiple regional
        SKUs when products are in low-volume production.

        That said, apparently the China market often likes to use
        US-style receptacles (types A or B), even though they use 220
        V (😬). The US-style plug has better density (twice as many
        receptacles in the same space as the China receptacle (Type C,
        or I ?), and with the US receptacles, there are many more
        aftermarket cable options available.  So I suppose that's my
        question: "Is this usage typical in China?"

        Of course, the big issue is that the US plug is not rated for
        the higher voltages, even though historically some people may
        say it works.  I even fouind a website that shows this,
        https://www.travelchinaguide.com/essential/electricity.htm

        I believe it is critical for manufacturers to not condone the
        use of the US plug in this manner, which appears to be common
        practice. And I usually advise that this type of usage should
        never be described, recommended, or mentioned in any manuals,
        brochures, or other written material produced by a company,
        either externally or internally. If anyone is injured and an
        investigation reveals agreement with this usage, the company
        may be held liable.

        Thoughts??

        -Doug


        Douglas E Powell
        Laporte, Colorado, USA
        doug...@gmail.com
        LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/coloradocomplianceguy/>

        (UTC-06:00, US-MDT)


        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
        Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the
        list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived
        and searchable on the web at:
        https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

        Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
        Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html
        (including how to unsubscribe)
        <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
        List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
        Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following
        link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
        <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>



--
    Charles Grasso

    Dish Technologies

     (c) 303-204-2974

    (w) 303-706-5467

    (h) 303-317-5530

    (e ) charles.gra...@dish.com

    (e2) chasgra...@gmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to