Further to John’s comment, here is an extract from EMC standard CISPR 22:

 

“The operational conditions of the EUT shall be determined by the manufacturer 
according to

the typical use of the EUT with respect to the expected highest level of 
emission. The

determined operational mode and the rationale for the conditions shall be 
stated in the test

report.”

 

The operating condition producing the highest level of emission may not be the 
rated output power of the EUT.  The manufacturer is expected to investigate.

 

Ralph

 

From: John Woodgate <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 9:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Switching power supplies continued

 

The DoC states the standards applied, and those standards (CISPR-originated) 
give very precise details of the test set-up.

On 2024-07-08 17:27, Matthew Wilson | GBE wrote:

The downside of third-party power supplies is although they will have a nice 
declaration of conformity (for us in the EU (OK I know UK isn’t any more but 
we’ve decided to carry on with it behind the scenes!) and claims for EMC 
compliance, never is any precise detail of how and the environment in which 
these tests were performed provided.  A resistive load on the shortest possible 
DC output leads, with short mains input leads too I’m sure is the setup – happy 
to be proved wrong!

-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best Wishes
John Woodgate
Keep trying

 


 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 

Virus-free. 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 www.avg.com

  _____  

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
<https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/%20>  

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/  <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/> 
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html> 
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Rick Linford at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

  _____  

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC 
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1> &A=1 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected]
Rick Linford at: [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to