Andy Holcomb wrote:
> What resolution of encoders have  should I use, my first thought is as 
> high as possible, is my logic wrong?
If you are going to use Gecko 320's and software step 
generation, then your logic is indeed wrong.  Depending on your 
software and CPU choice, software step generation maxes out at 
40 - 50 thousand steps/second.  Assuming a 5 TPI leadscrew with 
the encoder directly driven from it, and 100 IPM rapid feeds, 
then you have 500 RPM on the screw.  If the encoder has, say, 
1000 cycles/rev, that gives 4000 counts in quadrature, so you 
have 500 * 4000 = 2,000,000 counts/minute, or 33,333 
counts/second.  That is nearing the limit of software.  If you 
wanted higher encoder resolution or higher rapid feed rates, you 
would be out of luck.

If you are using hardware step generation, or get rid of the 
steps entirely, like with my PPMC or universal PWM controller 
system, then it is not a concern.

Higher encoder resolution leads to a stiffer and smoother servo 
response, in general.

Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to