Todd Bombaci wrote:
> Hi
> I would like to see some discussion's on having a president for emc so 
> the project can be followed in the way it was started and that's for an 
> industrial cnc control and not a hobby cnc control. A person who is 
> knows industrial controls and integration. Most corporations not only 
> have a board but also a president who can make sure safe control theory 
> and not hobby practices are used. I would like to nominate Ray Henry for 
> this position if it is taken any farther.
> Thank you

There is a "president" position on the board, but it is not particularly
different than any other board member.  The president presides at board
meetings if needed.  However all board members have equal votes.  If you
believe Ray represents your wishes, nominate him for the board, and vote
for him.

In my opinion, EMC should always strive to be an "industrial" quality
controller.  But we should not turn our backs on "hobby" users either.

To imply that "hobby practices" are unsafe is rather insulting.  I may
work on EMC as a hobby, but in my day job I design 200-1000 horsepower
drives for a major industrial supplier.  I am well aware of safety
issues in an industrial control environment.

I also am well aware that the safety of a machine is determined by the
person who does the machine integration, NOT by the software.  You can
build a safe machine with EMC, and you can build an unsafe machine with
EMC.

Regards,

John Kasunich


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to