On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 21:52 -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
... snip
> > problem? Maybe missing pulses or noise adding pulses? Thanks for any
> > replies.
> It could be anything, so you have to investigate.  First, put 
> halmeter on the HAL pin  ppmc.0.encoder.2.count, rotate the 
> spindle to a known position, and read thhe halmeter value.
> (The above assumes you have the spindle encoder on axis 2, if it 
> is on axis 3 use that number between encoder and count.)  Now, 
> turn the spindle exactly one turn and read again.  The 
> difference should be equal to the expected 5000 counts.

Thanks Jon and Chris. I verified the encoder had 5000 pulses/revolution.
I then did the above and got varying counts in the mid 4ks. Upon
inspecting the encoder I found the disk had a slight wobble towards one
side of the sensor. I shimmed it away from the sensor a little and I now
get 5000 counts per revolution plus or minus one count on occasion. My
threads now come out fine. I like these US Digital disks, but
apparently, I still haven't learned the proper way to fit them to a hub.
I wonder if there is a way to have EMC check encoders by comparing pulse
count against the index. If index doesn't appear when the count predicts
it, a warning could be issued.

-- 
Kirk Wallace
(Hardinge HNC lathe, California, USA
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/ )



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to